Skip to main content

From Software that mimics human intelligence to Software that is autonomously intelligent

Today I just remembered the original vision I had about artificial intelligence back around 2001! My goal was something I called machine intelligence, although I am not the inventor of this term, I had a definition of my own for it. 

The problem I was concerned about was that software (of that time) and even now is not very intelligent. By intelligent I mean nothing directly related to human intelligence like reasoning, vision, mathematical abilities, etc. What I was concerned about was software being more intelligent within its own environment, which is the internet, and maybe sometimes responding with intelligence to its user, without actually explicitly coding out all the rules the software needed to follow to act with what we will perceive as intelligent. 

My vision was about software that was adaptable, that would learn from user behaviour and the general internet ecosystem, and actually upgrade itself, fix its own bugs, optimize slow portions of itself, protect against intrusion (just like the human immune system), etc. 

I wanted software that was an organism, that could learn and evolve on its own to become better and better at what it was originally intended to do, just like a lizard operates autonomously without external intervention as it goes along surviving, it really doesn't need human reasoning to survive. It has instincts and it survives in its own environment. 

Of course, there is nothing wrong with trying to make software that acts with human intelligence and this is the big lofty goal we are all working towards, but that was not my initial concern. My goals were much more modest, to make software that could adapt to its environment, be it with user interaction or as it operates on the internet, and become better every day without any explicit programming from a human programmer. 

It's time to start investigating this field again since not much has improved in terms of this. Any improvements we see in our software with every update is actually obtained from the intelligence of some programmer and very little is actually obtained from the software itself optimizing itself autonomously. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Information interfaces, the true promise of chatGPT, Bing, Bard, etc.

LLMs like chatGPT are the latest coolest innovation in town. Many people are even speculating with high confidence that these new tools are already Generally intelligent. Well, as with every new hype from self-driving cars based on deeplearning to the current LLMs are AGI, we often tend to miss the importance of these new technologies because we are often engulfed in too much hype which gets investors hyper interested and then lose interest in the whole field of AI when the promises do not pan out. The most important thing about chatGPT and co is that they are showing us a new way to access information. Most of the time we are not interested in going too deep into typical list-based search engine results to get answers and with the abuse of search results using SEO optimizations and the general trend towards too many ads, finding answers online has become a laborious task.  Why people are gobbling up stuff like chatGPT is not really about AGI, but it is about a new and novel way to...

Next Steps Towards Strong Artificial Intelligence

What is Intelligence? Pathways to Synthetic Intelligence If you follow current AI Research then it will be apparent to you that AI research, the deep learning type has stalled! This does not mean that new areas of application for existing techniques are not appearing but that the fundamentals have been solved and things have become pretty standardized.

Human intelligence is more about knowledge utilization

There are two significant phases of intelligence, the first is the knowledge acquisition phase and the second is the knowledge utilisation phase. The knowledge acquisition stage is available by default in many animals but what makes humans unique is that our ability to utilize knowledge is far higher than most mammals.  But even humans individually and as a whole utilize only a very tiny fraction of the available knowledge. For an individual your acquired knowledge base, that is knowledge you have acquired both consciously through study or unconsciously through just existing, is far more than what you are able to utilize.  This is also similar for humanity as a whole, the knowledge we possess both in written form or in other forms far outweighs our ability to utilize it.  The core part of what we could call general intelligence is really more about knowledge utilization and less about acquisition. Because what is useful is only what we can utilize, the rest is just memory...